What we’ll be focusing on in the main are the gamut of devices that emit electromagnetic energy that are often also able to measure the body’s own weak electromagnetic fields. Off our list of talking points will also be the use of intense light from lasers, such as Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT). Technologies also used by physiotherapists, that we won’t include here, are thermal methods such as therapeutic ultrasound as that deals with sound waves, which generate acoustic and vibratory frequencies but not electrical, magnetic or electromagnetic fields, as we also discussed in Part 1. These include a range of technologies that use electrical currents (microcurrents) to trigger nerves and muscles, that induce a thermal (heating) effect often among other effects, such as Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES), Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), Iontophoresis (which we mentioned in relation to Robert Becker’s work with silver ions and joint healing in Part 1), High Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS), and the like. We won’t be talking, except in passing, about the multitude of electrotherapeutic devices that have been widely used in conventional medicine, especially in physiotherapy, some for over 70 years. There are an incredibly diverse range of commercial devices being used in the health space that rely on frequencies. If a practitioner is involved, properly informed consent also requires that the user is informed of possible alternative interventions so he or she can exercise the freedom to choose. This requires that users of devices are provided with information on the potential risks and benefits of the intervention, before they use it. We also aim to give you the categories of information that we think should be available to anyone who consents to use such a device of this type, in accordance with one of the most important and fundamental principles of medical ethics, namely informed consent. This article, which follows Part 1 that aimed to show why electromagnetism and resultant frequencies are inexorably linked to life and health, has been written to help demystify the rapidly emerging field of frequency-based devices, as used for assessing aspects of health, or for treating the body, either in healthy people or those with a specific condition. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised about the potential for harm, given we now know categorically that some low intensity electromagnetic fields that deliver low to mid-range frequencies, such as those used in powerlines, wifi routers and mobile phones, can also do harm, especially to those who are electrohypersensitive. This has been most evident with electromagnetic field based devices used occupationally by physiotherapy operators on a daily basis and for extended periods of time. More than this, some devices falling under the amorphous banner of ‘frequency medicine devices’ have actually bee n found to cause harm. It’s also an area where, in the case of some devices, it’s not possible to appraise either safety or benefits because there just aren’t enough technical data available to know what the devices are actually doing as they interact with the human body. This is one area where the phrase, “ not all are created equally”, is especially pertinent. This area of subtle energy medicine – as relevant as it is for many – we’ll leave for another article. That includes everything from acupuncture, qigong, reiki and homeopathy, through to hands on healing, crystal therapy, and distance healing. We won’t be dealing here with some of the non-technologically dependent modalities of frequency medicine, other than in passing. This article is about helping you to make sense of this rapidly expanding sector of primarily electrically-powered frequency medicine devices. Or they’ve been fabricated by over-zealous marketeers keen to make a buck. The testimonials are from intensely satisfied people who’d experienced what many might typically classify as a miracle. Your critical mind tells you this could mean only one of two things. Let’s also not forget the athletes who used it who developed superhuman powers. Others came from people so ill they were permanently bed bound – until their frequency treatment got them walking again. Some were from cancer patients who were classified as terminally ill who’ve gone into ‘spontaneous remission’. You’ve read dozens of testimonials and your head’s still spinning. You’ve heard news of a revolutionary frequency-based device that has a list of diseases it can supposedly remedy that would make Pfizer’s R&D team leader quiver. By Rob Verkerk PhD, founder, executive & scientific director, Alliance for Natural Health International
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |